Indian Army Lieutenant’s Faith Sparks Controversy: Cohesion vs. Conviction
Lieutenant Samuel Kamalesan, who joined the Indian Army in 2017, was removed from service in 2021 after refusing to participate in Hindu rituals at his regiment’s temple. Despite attending weekly parades and standing respectfully during religious events, Kamalesan cited Christian convictions against idol worship, seeking exemption from direct participation. However, the Delhi High Court ruled on May 30 that his dismissal was valid, prioritizing military cohesion and discipline over personal religious choices.
The court’s decision has sparked debate, with critics arguing that it constitutes religious coercion and undermines India’s secular character. Jesuit Father A. Santhanam, a legal expert, warned that the ruling could set a dangerous precedent, stating, “No authority or order can compel someone to act against their beliefs, such coercion amounts to a form of violence.” Kamalesan’s supporters are considering an appeal, highlighting the tension between military obligations and individual freedom of religion.
The case raises important questions about the balance between military discipline and personal convictions. As Father Santhanam noted, “Such a punishment constitutes religious coercion and undermines India’s secular character.” The outcome of any potential appeal will be closely watched, with implications for the rights of military personnel to practice their faith without coercion
